For people who climb for a living. 09 274 8090

Aspiring sling and its fall-arrest ability

Aspiring sling and its fall-arrest ability

Richard Tregoweth - Saturday, January 09, 2010

Dave has questioned the "fall-arrest ability" of the rated 22 kN Aspiring sling used on the DB Tree rope saver. He highlights a very important issue relating to all rope savers - particularly those being made for personal use by individual climbers (see Kong Duck blog). That is, manufacturers (and climbers making home-made rope savers) must ensure there is sufficient energy absorption designed into the system to accommodate a 'safe' fall (or is that an oxymoron).

ART have incorporated the 'fall-arrest' feature into their rope guides due to the unforgiving nature of the mechanical 'cam-based'device used for adjustment around the anchor point. The cam 'locks' onto the rope and offers very little creep (energy absorption) so ART have compensatedfor this with a tear-away feature.

In contrast to the ART cam-based system, traditional cambium savers (and the DB Tree rope saver) rely on the humble friction hitch. Tied correctly,friction hitches typically outperform mechanical devices.

When using a 2-ring based cambium saver with no length adjustment (eg Timbersaws) the energy generated in the event of a fall is transferred to the climbers'friction hitch. The level of 'fall-arrest energy absorption" is dependent on the type of friction hitch you have tied (download Friction Hitch Report here tomake comparisons).

The DB Tree rope saver and the Treemagineers Sirius MultiSAVER are adjustable via the use of an additional friction hitch. DB Tree use the 22 kN ratedAspiring webbing sling to tie theirs and the MultiSAVER utilizes a certifed (EN 795B) Sirius RingLOOP. By adding these additional friction hitches to theirsystems, DB Tree and the Treemagineers have incorporated another level of energy absorption and safety. In the event of a fall, energy is absorbed by bothfriction hitches - one on the rope saver and one at your Hitch Climber (or equivalent), thereby increasing the fall-arrest ability of their respectiverope savers.

The reality is tree climbers should NOT be in a position where the activation of a 'fall arrest' mechanism is necessary. They achieve this by ensuringthere is no slack in their climbing system (ie no rope slack below the knee). Tree climbers are trained to use the Work Positioning method which allowsthem to work, with their hands free, while hanging in their equipment. ie they always work below their anchor point.

The Fall Arrest method is more commonly used in industrial height safety. For example an arborist hydraulic bucket operator would use the Fall Arrestmethod NOT Work Positioning.

If we agree there should be no slack in a tree climbers system the logical conclusion is: quoting 'fall arrest' ratings is somewhat redundant.

As an addendum to this story, the Aspiring webbing sling used by DB Tree has generated some debate in the past. To prove the reliability of the sling the DB Tree team drop-tested a sling (using 100 kg weights) that had seen nine months of everyday use by Auckland climber Johno Smith. See the test in the video below or visit Treetools on YouTube to view the full series of DB Tree tests.

Copyright © Treetools New Zealand 2024. All rights reserved.